Supreme Court’s “Chaidez” decision limits “Padilla v. Kentucky”
Click the link below to download a PDF of the published article – AkronBar-Publication-Chaidez-Padilla-10-2013
LA AUTORIZACIÓN DE EMPLEO SIGUE DISPONIBLE SI EL CASO SE CIERRA ADMINISTRATIVAMENTE
©Abogado Farhad Sethna 2013 El 6 de septiembre de 2013, la Oficina de Apelaciones Administrativas ( “AAO”) decidió un caso que originó en el Centro de Servicios de Texas. Este […]
EAD available following Administrative Closure of Removal Case
(EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION STILL AVAILABLE IF CASE IS ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED) © Attorney Farhad Sethna 2013 On September 6, 2013, the Administrative Appeals Office (“AAO”) decided a case that arose from the […]
ALIEN GETS THIRD CHANCE TO FIND IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE
By Attorney Farhad Sethna, © 2013 Hervens Timothe, an immigrant from Haiti, received a third chance to find immigration counsel. The Board of Immigration Appeals held on August 29, 2013 […]
PADILLA HEARING RESULTS IN REOPENING REMOVAL CASE
By Farhad Sethna, Attorney, © 2013 In the case of Sewdat Rajpaul, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held on August 15, 2013 that it would reopen its prior final […]
OPENING AND CLOSING ARGUMENTS IN IMMIGRATION COURT
© 2013 Attorney Farhad Sethna In previous articles, I have covered topics such as how to recognize a difficult immigration judge, handling a difficult immigration judge, and preparing a witness […]
PREPARING A WITNESS FOR IMMIGRATION COURT
© Attorney Farhad Sethna 2013 Testifying in immigration court can be a tricky matter. First of all, there are no rules of evidence in immigration court. There are also very […]
DEALING WITH A DIFFICULT IMMIGRATION JUDGE
© Attorney Farhad Sethna 2013 In the previous article, I described how one recognizes a difficult immigration judge. In this article, I am going to discuss my suggestions for how […]